<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to be Light</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fatcyclist.com/2007/06/24/how-to-be-light/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fatcyclist.com/2007/06/24/how-to-be-light/</link>
	<description>It's like reality TV. Except it's real. And there's no TV.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2022 03:21:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GaurryLaulk</title>
		<link>http://www.fatcyclist.com/2007/06/24/how-to-be-light/comment-page-2/#comment-76399</link>
		<dc:creator>GaurryLaulk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fatcyclist.com/2007/06/24/how-to-be-light/#comment-76399</guid>
		<description>tramadol 50mg tramadol hydrochloride tablets  
cheap tramadol tramadol hydrocholride tramadol stories tramadol hypoglycemia interacciones ketorolaco y tramadol extracting opiods from tramadol tramadol cash on delivery cod tramadol treasure information tramadol 50mg lowest price tramadol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tramadol 50mg tramadol hydrochloride tablets<br />
cheap tramadol tramadol hydrocholride tramadol stories tramadol hypoglycemia interacciones ketorolaco y tramadol extracting opiods from tramadol tramadol cash on delivery cod tramadol treasure information tramadol 50mg lowest price tramadol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quadzilla</title>
		<link>http://www.fatcyclist.com/2007/06/24/how-to-be-light/comment-page-2/#comment-30612</link>
		<dc:creator>quadzilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fatcyclist.com/2007/06/24/how-to-be-light/#comment-30612</guid>
		<description>Now this is funny!   ....but don&#039;t think I won&#039;t be incorporating some of these! haha

deb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now this is funny!   &#8230;.but don&#8217;t think I won&#8217;t be incorporating some of these! haha</p>
<p>deb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.fatcyclist.com/2007/06/24/how-to-be-light/comment-page-2/#comment-22672</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fatcyclist.com/2007/06/24/how-to-be-light/#comment-22672</guid>
		<description>spbarnes is correct.  It is impossible to pedal ion a sine wave.  The motion ones foot makes (or a point on the pedal) is called a cycloid of revolution and it looks not a whole lot like a sinewave.  The actual sinewave represents the height of a point on a circle w/respect to the x-axis as a function of the amount of rotation (theta) required to get to that point, given that the radius is of unit length.

&#039;Nuff math geekery for today.  Climb away, and pedal in cycloids.  Don&#039;t forget to wax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>spbarnes is correct.  It is impossible to pedal ion a sine wave.  The motion ones foot makes (or a point on the pedal) is called a cycloid of revolution and it looks not a whole lot like a sinewave.  The actual sinewave represents the height of a point on a circle w/respect to the x-axis as a function of the amount of rotation (theta) required to get to that point, given that the radius is of unit length.</p>
<p>&#8216;Nuff math geekery for today.  Climb away, and pedal in cycloids.  Don&#8217;t forget to wax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buckythedonkey</title>
		<link>http://www.fatcyclist.com/2007/06/24/how-to-be-light/comment-page-2/#comment-22587</link>
		<dc:creator>buckythedonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 07:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fatcyclist.com/2007/06/24/how-to-be-light/#comment-22587</guid>
		<description>Josh, not only does my formula prove your 1:1 theory but it also allows for the likelihood that the radius of the rear wheel will not equal the crank arm length.

Have a beer, it will all become clear!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh, not only does my formula prove your 1:1 theory but it also allows for the likelihood that the radius of the rear wheel will not equal the crank arm length.</p>
<p>Have a beer, it will all become clear!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Mike In Oz</title>
		<link>http://www.fatcyclist.com/2007/06/24/how-to-be-light/comment-page-2/#comment-22488</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Mike In Oz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 20:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fatcyclist.com/2007/06/24/how-to-be-light/#comment-22488</guid>
		<description>Waxing:  I heard Al Maviva started waxing.  He lost 15 pounds that day.  And now you can tell the difference between him and his mother in the family photos.

Nails:  Don&#039;t trim them with scissors.  Bite them.  I know it&#039;s counter-productive for the weight loss thing, but you have to look at the big picture.  Fingernails are good roughage and who doesn&#039;t need a little more fibre in their diet.  Plus, if you eat your own body parts, isn&#039;t that recycling.

Sunscreen:  It&#039;s not just the weight of the sunscreen.  When you get out on the trail the sunscreen acts like glue and the dust sticking to the glue triples the already huge weight of the original sunscreen.

Sweating got mentioned but somehow didn&#039;t rate its own category.  I hereby indoctrinate SWEATING into the gallery of weight loss techniques.  Or rather NOT sweating.  Why?  Mostly for the same reasons I gave with sunscreen above.  Dirt and dust stick to sweat nearly as well as they stick to sunscreen.

Now of course these last 2 issues are only of concern to mountain bikers because everyone knows that riding on the road or velodrome attracts no dirt.  In fact I suggest that after a road century you simply pull on your business suit and go right out and shake the presidents hand.  You can brush your hair if you wish, but since you haven&#039;t been &quot;roughing it&quot; off road there should be no grubbyness to feel selfconscious about.

There&#039;s a glaring omission in the clothing area also... How can you throw away half your kit and talk about no need for comfort and keep the heaviest part of the cycling outfit - the chamois.  Get rid of the chamois.  If you want to go fast this helps in several ways.  You&#039;re lighter (the whole point of this post), it absorbs sweat thus holding on to weight (if you&#039;re still sweating at this stage) and finally it allows you to sit down while riding.

On that last point, who&#039;s the fastest bike rider you know?  Robbie McEwen?  Alessandro Petacchi?  Tom Boonen?  I don&#039;t want to get into a semantic argument here.  The point is these guys are the fastest of the fast and when do they go the fastest?  At the end of a race.  How do they do it?  The don&#039;t sit on the seat.  Imagine how much faster they&#039;d be if they never sat down.  It will take some work and you&#039;ll bring some new muscle groups into play but it&#039;s worth it in the end.

And what buckythedonkey said too: balls.  Lance Armstrong was 50% faster than everyone else because he had 50% less testicular encumberances when he climbed.

Josh:  I was going to look that up.  Thanks for saving me the time.  Now I&#039;ll just spend the rest of the evening reading about the cycloid in nature chapter I&#039;ve found in the textbook I&#039;m appraising for school.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Waxing:  I heard Al Maviva started waxing.  He lost 15 pounds that day.  And now you can tell the difference between him and his mother in the family photos.</p>
<p>Nails:  Don&#8217;t trim them with scissors.  Bite them.  I know it&#8217;s counter-productive for the weight loss thing, but you have to look at the big picture.  Fingernails are good roughage and who doesn&#8217;t need a little more fibre in their diet.  Plus, if you eat your own body parts, isn&#8217;t that recycling.</p>
<p>Sunscreen:  It&#8217;s not just the weight of the sunscreen.  When you get out on the trail the sunscreen acts like glue and the dust sticking to the glue triples the already huge weight of the original sunscreen.</p>
<p>Sweating got mentioned but somehow didn&#8217;t rate its own category.  I hereby indoctrinate SWEATING into the gallery of weight loss techniques.  Or rather NOT sweating.  Why?  Mostly for the same reasons I gave with sunscreen above.  Dirt and dust stick to sweat nearly as well as they stick to sunscreen.</p>
<p>Now of course these last 2 issues are only of concern to mountain bikers because everyone knows that riding on the road or velodrome attracts no dirt.  In fact I suggest that after a road century you simply pull on your business suit and go right out and shake the presidents hand.  You can brush your hair if you wish, but since you haven&#8217;t been &#8220;roughing it&#8221; off road there should be no grubbyness to feel selfconscious about.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a glaring omission in the clothing area also&#8230; How can you throw away half your kit and talk about no need for comfort and keep the heaviest part of the cycling outfit &#8211; the chamois.  Get rid of the chamois.  If you want to go fast this helps in several ways.  You&#8217;re lighter (the whole point of this post), it absorbs sweat thus holding on to weight (if you&#8217;re still sweating at this stage) and finally it allows you to sit down while riding.</p>
<p>On that last point, who&#8217;s the fastest bike rider you know?  Robbie McEwen?  Alessandro Petacchi?  Tom Boonen?  I don&#8217;t want to get into a semantic argument here.  The point is these guys are the fastest of the fast and when do they go the fastest?  At the end of a race.  How do they do it?  The don&#8217;t sit on the seat.  Imagine how much faster they&#8217;d be if they never sat down.  It will take some work and you&#8217;ll bring some new muscle groups into play but it&#8217;s worth it in the end.</p>
<p>And what buckythedonkey said too: balls.  Lance Armstrong was 50% faster than everyone else because he had 50% less testicular encumberances when he climbed.</p>
<p>Josh:  I was going to look that up.  Thanks for saving me the time.  Now I&#8217;ll just spend the rest of the evening reading about the cycloid in nature chapter I&#8217;ve found in the textbook I&#8217;m appraising for school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://www.fatcyclist.com/2007/06/24/how-to-be-light/comment-page-2/#comment-22452</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fatcyclist.com/2007/06/24/how-to-be-light/#comment-22452</guid>
		<description>No doubt about it, Fatty, you are extremely light -- between the ears.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt about it, Fatty, you are extremely light &#8212; between the ears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Kurgen</title>
		<link>http://www.fatcyclist.com/2007/06/24/how-to-be-light/comment-page-2/#comment-22451</link>
		<dc:creator>The Kurgen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fatcyclist.com/2007/06/24/how-to-be-light/#comment-22451</guid>
		<description>Easy now, with the removal of a testical call.  I am six years in remission after HAVING to part with my right testical.  I do find find my pedal stroke is slightly lopsided now.  Tell the wife to keep fighting, I will be sending out positive vibes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Easy now, with the removal of a testical call.  I am six years in remission after HAVING to part with my right testical.  I do find find my pedal stroke is slightly lopsided now.  Tell the wife to keep fighting, I will be sending out positive vibes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.fatcyclist.com/2007/06/24/how-to-be-light/comment-page-2/#comment-22418</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fatcyclist.com/2007/06/24/how-to-be-light/#comment-22418</guid>
		<description>Oh, no my friend, a 1:1 ratio I believe is favorable for a cycloid.  That being One rotation of the crank produces exactly One rotation of the wheel.  The actual length of the crank arm is of no matter in this case as we are talking about angular velocity.  So long as the angular velocity of the crank arm is consistent with the angular velocity of the wheel, we then would produce a cycloid as previously defined.
But as Fatty has pointed out, cycloids are superfluous and I must try and learn to peddle a Sine curve...My knees are hurting just thinking about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, no my friend, a 1:1 ratio I believe is favorable for a cycloid.  That being One rotation of the crank produces exactly One rotation of the wheel.  The actual length of the crank arm is of no matter in this case as we are talking about angular velocity.  So long as the angular velocity of the crank arm is consistent with the angular velocity of the wheel, we then would produce a cycloid as previously defined.<br />
But as Fatty has pointed out, cycloids are superfluous and I must try and learn to peddle a Sine curve&#8230;My knees are hurting just thinking about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buckythedonkey</title>
		<link>http://www.fatcyclist.com/2007/06/24/how-to-be-light/comment-page-2/#comment-22366</link>
		<dc:creator>buckythedonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 10:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fatcyclist.com/2007/06/24/how-to-be-light/#comment-22366</guid>
		<description>Sorry Josh, while your hypothesis has merit, your working is incomplete. To trace a perfect cycloid I believe that you&#039;d have to be riding a fixed-ratio rig with the following properties:

The ratio of sproket to chainring must be 1:n where:

d = diameter of rear wheel
c = crank arm length
b = beer-related miscalculation factor (b=1 being an error-free calc)
n = d/2cb

Er, I think (hic!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Josh, while your hypothesis has merit, your working is incomplete. To trace a perfect cycloid I believe that you&#8217;d have to be riding a fixed-ratio rig with the following properties:</p>
<p>The ratio of sproket to chainring must be 1:n where:</p>
<p>d = diameter of rear wheel<br />
c = crank arm length<br />
b = beer-related miscalculation factor (b=1 being an error-free calc)<br />
n = d/2cb</p>
<p>Er, I think (hic!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.fatcyclist.com/2007/06/24/how-to-be-light/comment-page-2/#comment-22332</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 05:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fatcyclist.com/2007/06/24/how-to-be-light/#comment-22332</guid>
		<description>Fatty, I happen to hold the patent on the sine wave pedal stroke (US Patent #3282925478). I fully intend to pursue every legal recourse available unless you tell us both how much you weigh AND what kind of helmet you were wearing.

BTW, were you riding down the south side of Suncrest about 9:00 Friday evening? Maybe it was some other guy with the armpits cut out of his jersey and a chamois taped to his bare butt. Whoever it was was descending quite quickly, which someone who is truly light would probably lack the mass to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fatty, I happen to hold the patent on the sine wave pedal stroke (US Patent #3282925478). I fully intend to pursue every legal recourse available unless you tell us both how much you weigh AND what kind of helmet you were wearing.</p>
<p>BTW, were you riding down the south side of Suncrest about 9:00 Friday evening? Maybe it was some other guy with the armpits cut out of his jersey and a chamois taped to his bare butt. Whoever it was was descending quite quickly, which someone who is truly light would probably lack the mass to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/18 queries in 0.022 seconds using disk

Served from: www.fatcyclist.com @ 2026-04-22 01:37:38 -->